header-logo header-logo

Law in 101 words

04 May 2017 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7744_ramage

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary, by Roderick Ramage

Cub journalist

My friend Ilan was the editor of the Manchester Law Students’ Society magazine, which attained its literary pinnacle at that time. His ambition was to find a part time job on qualifying as a solicitor, six months law and six months playing the saxophone on a tropical island. I submitted a piece to the magazine, and, in his rejection note, he wrote: Dear Roderick, I am sorry that I cannot accept your offering. To be blunt it is no good. In fact it was so bad that I had to correct it before I could throw it into my waste bin.

Duplicates & counterparts

An instrument is executed in duplicate (or triplicate etc) if each part is executed by all the parties. Each part is an original. Alternatively one party, commonly a landlord, executes the principal document and the tenant executes a counterpart. If there is an inconsistency, the original prevails. Do not confuse this with the finding of fact in English Bridge v HMRC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll