header-logo header-logo

Law centres challenge G4S contract

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Law Centres Network (LCN) is taking the government to court for awarding the national discrimination helpline contract to global security company G4S.

LCN’s judicial review application asks the high court to quash the G4S contract and order the government to run a new, revised tender.

G4S is due to take over the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS), which runs the free helpline, on 30 September when the current contract expires. The EASS is currently run by a company called Sitel in partnership with Disability Rights UK and several smaller organisations.

LCN argues that the government did not properly assess the shortcomings of the helpline with stakeholders, and failed to consider how to reform it with the independent equalities watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission. It argues the government failed to properly consider G4S’s equality and human rights record in the many other public services it has delivered. It claims G4S also faces a conflict of interest in providing a service that its own employees might want to consult.

A recent report by the Equality Act and Disability Select Committee recommended that the Equality and Human Rights Commission manage the helpline service.

Daniel Carey, solicitor with Deighton Pierce Glynn, acting for LCN, said: “This case concerns the legal duty on the government to assess the equalities impact of procurement decisions.

“One would expect a high degree of compliance where the Government Equalities Office was the decision maker and the service being procured was an equalities advice line. We have written to the government and G4S on LCN’s behalf and a response is anxiously awaited.”

More than 55,000 people have signed an online petition, initiated by consumer watchdog SomeOfUs.org, against awarding the contract to G4S. 

Sondhya Gupta, senior campaigner with SomeOfUs.org, said: “Its staff were found to have unlawfully killed Jimmy Mubenga who was being deported to Angola. The government has recently had to step in and take control of a young offenders’ unit [Medway Secure Training Centre in Kent], after G4S staff were accused of assaulting children there. And the company has been caught overcharging taxpayers by millions [for electronic tagging]. This decision is a kick in the teeth to everyone who faces disability, race or sex discrimination.”

A Government spokesperson said: “The Equality Advisory and Support Service is an important source of free advice and support for people facing discrimination or human rights issues.

“To ensure the service can continue and is run as effectively and efficiently as possible, we ran an open and competitive tender process to identify who is best to take it forward. Following this, G4S has been successful and it will be running the service for three years from October 2016.”

A G4S spokesperson said six other companies completed the framework process to be able to tender, including Capita, Serco, Sitel and Agilisys.

Neil Malpas, the G4S Managing Director responsible for the service, said: “We would welcome and support any review of the tendering process for the EASS helpline, which in our view was conducted very openly, professionally and competitively. 

"We were awarded the contract on the strength of our work handling other complex call centres including the Department of Work and Pensions' (DWP) child maintenance options service. We have supported that helpline for separating parents over the past three years and feedback from callers and the DWP has been positive.”

Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll