header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law centres challenge G4S contract

The Law Centres Network (LCN) is taking the government to court for awarding the national discrimination helpline contract to global security company G4S.

LCN’s judicial review application asks the high court to quash the G4S contract and order the government to run a new, revised tender.

G4S is due to take over the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS), which runs the free helpline, on 30 September when the current contract expires. The EASS is currently run by a company called Sitel in partnership with Disability Rights UK and several smaller organisations.

LCN argues that the government did not properly assess the shortcomings of the helpline with stakeholders, and failed to consider how to reform it with the independent equalities watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission. It argues the government failed to properly consider G4S’s equality and human rights record in the many other public services it has delivered. It claims G4S also faces a conflict of interest in providing a service that its own employees might want to consult.

A recent report by the Equality Act and Disability Select Committee recommended that the Equality and Human Rights Commission manage the helpline service.

Daniel Carey, solicitor with Deighton Pierce Glynn, acting for LCN, said: “This case concerns the legal duty on the government to assess the equalities impact of procurement decisions.

“One would expect a high degree of compliance where the Government Equalities Office was the decision maker and the service being procured was an equalities advice line. We have written to the government and G4S on LCN’s behalf and a response is anxiously awaited.”

More than 55,000 people have signed an online petition, initiated by consumer watchdog SomeOfUs.org, against awarding the contract to G4S. 

Sondhya Gupta, senior campaigner with SomeOfUs.org, said: “Its staff were found to have unlawfully killed Jimmy Mubenga who was being deported to Angola. The government has recently had to step in and take control of a young offenders’ unit [Medway Secure Training Centre in Kent], after G4S staff were accused of assaulting children there. And the company has been caught overcharging taxpayers by millions [for electronic tagging]. This decision is a kick in the teeth to everyone who faces disability, race or sex discrimination.”

A Government spokesperson said: “The Equality Advisory and Support Service is an important source of free advice and support for people facing discrimination or human rights issues.

“To ensure the service can continue and is run as effectively and efficiently as possible, we ran an open and competitive tender process to identify who is best to take it forward. Following this, G4S has been successful and it will be running the service for three years from October 2016.”

A G4S spokesperson said six other companies completed the framework process to be able to tender, including Capita, Serco, Sitel and Agilisys.

Neil Malpas, the G4S Managing Director responsible for the service, said: “We would welcome and support any review of the tendering process for the EASS helpline, which in our view was conducted very openly, professionally and competitively. 

"We were awarded the contract on the strength of our work handling other complex call centres including the Department of Work and Pensions' (DWP) child maintenance options service. We have supported that helpline for separating parents over the past three years and feedback from callers and the DWP has been positive.”

Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll