header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (Harrington) v Bromley Magistrates Court [2007] EWHC 2896 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 199 (Nov)

 The magistrates indicated that the defendant would not be committed to the crown court for sentence provided that the pre-sentence report did not disclose that he was a danger to the pub­lic.

 

Although the report stated that he was not, he was nonetheless subsequently committed for sentence. He argued that his committal was un­lawful, being contrary to a legitimate expectation engendered by the indication that had been given by the justices.

 

HELD When the challenge is not to the origi­nal decision, but to the decision to commit despite the indication given by the magistrates, the court is reviewing the reasonableness of the decision to commit for sentence, not the view taken by the original bench. However, it is im­possible to conceive of circumstances in which a properly given indication could be gone back on by a subsequent decision without that deci­sion itself being held to be irrational or unlaw­ful.

Whenever the challenge arises, whether it is to the original or subsequent decision, it is the rationality and lawfulness of the first decision which ultimately determines the issue (per Mr Justice Mitting at para 12).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll