header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Jun)

The statutory scheme established by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 specifically defines what “remuneration” means by reference to the question whether or not money payments paid to workers are paid by the employer. That question calls for a precise legal analysis of the payment. The question is determined by the answer to the question “who owned the money which was paid to the employees at the point they were paid”?

It followed that, where restaurant or bar service charges are paid by the customer to the employer, but are then paid into a “troncmaster’s” bank account for distribution by him in accordance with a “tronc scheme” agreed between the troncmaster and employees, the sums so distributed to employees are not “paid by the employer” for the purposes of being included in  the national minimum wage calculation.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll