header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Jun)

The statutory scheme established by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 specifically defines what “remuneration” means by reference to the question whether or not money payments paid to workers are paid by the employer. That question calls for a precise legal analysis of the payment. The question is determined by the answer to the question “who owned the money which was paid to the employees at the point they were paid”?

It followed that, where restaurant or bar service charges are paid by the customer to the employer, but are then paid into a “troncmaster’s” bank account for distribution by him in accordance with a “tronc scheme” agreed between the troncmaster and employees, the sums so distributed to employees are not “paid by the employer” for the purposes of being included in  the national minimum wage calculation.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll