header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Jun)

The statutory scheme established by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 specifically defines what “remuneration” means by reference to the question whether or not money payments paid to workers are paid by the employer. That question calls for a precise legal analysis of the payment. The question is determined by the answer to the question “who owned the money which was paid to the employees at the point they were paid”?

It followed that, where restaurant or bar service charges are paid by the customer to the employer, but are then paid into a “troncmaster’s” bank account for distribution by him in accordance with a “tronc scheme” agreed between the troncmaster and employees, the sums so distributed to employees are not “paid by the employer” for the purposes of being included in  the national minimum wage calculation.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll