header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tort

Hull v Sanderson [2008] EWCA Civ 1211, [2008] All ER (D) 39 (Nov)

For the Fairchild exception to apply, (i) the claimant must show that it is inherently impossible, because of the current state of scientific knowledge, for the claimant to prove exactly how his injury was caused; (ii) the defendant’s conduct must have materially increased the risk of injury to the claimant; (iii) the defendant’s conduct must have been capable of causing the claimant’s injury; (iv) the claimant has to show that the injury was caused by the eventuation of the kind of risk created by the defendant’s wrongdoing; and (v) the injury must be caused by the same agency as was involved in the defendant’s wrongdoing.

Issue: 7345 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins hires two talented legal directors

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll