header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 21 November 2025

Costs

Dover Farm Developments Ltd v Lucas and others [2025] EWHC 2862 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on costs following a hearing where both parties’ applications were unsuccessful. The defendants’ strike-out application was dismissed, and the claimants’ application to amend their particulars of claim was refused because they had not provided a proper draft of the amendments. The claim was subsequently stayed and the parties engaged in a successful court-mediated settlement, with only the costs of the hearing remaining unresolved. Applying CPR 44.2, the court determined that while the general rule would make the defendants liable for the costs of the strike-out application and the claimants liable for the costs of the amendment application, several factors warranted consideration, including that both applications were heard together, the defendants later consented to amended particulars, and the hearing facilitated the eventual mediation. The court assessed the claimants’ recoverable costs at £4,597.44 and the defendants’ costs at £493.32, resulting in a net payment of £4,104.12 due from the defendants to the claimants.


Family proceedings

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll