header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 21 November 2025

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Dover Farm Developments Ltd v Lucas and others [2025] EWHC 2862 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on costs following a hearing where both parties’ applications were unsuccessful. The defendants’ strike-out application was dismissed, and the claimants’ application to amend their particulars of claim was refused because they had not provided a proper draft of the amendments. The claim was subsequently stayed and the parties engaged in a successful court-mediated settlement, with only the costs of the hearing remaining unresolved. Applying CPR 44.2, the court determined that while the general rule would make the defendants liable for the costs of the strike-out application and the claimants liable for the costs of the amendment application, several factors warranted consideration, including that both applications were heard together, the defendants later consented to amended particulars, and the hearing facilitated the eventual mediation. The court assessed the claimants’ recoverable costs at £4,597.44 and the defendants’ costs at £493.32, resulting in a net payment of £4,104.12 due from the defendants to the claimants.


Family proceedings

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll