header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 21 November 2025

Costs

Dover Farm Developments Ltd v Lucas and others [2025] EWHC 2862 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on costs following a hearing where both parties’ applications were unsuccessful. The defendants’ strike-out application was dismissed, and the claimants’ application to amend their particulars of claim was refused because they had not provided a proper draft of the amendments. The claim was subsequently stayed and the parties engaged in a successful court-mediated settlement, with only the costs of the hearing remaining unresolved. Applying CPR 44.2, the court determined that while the general rule would make the defendants liable for the costs of the strike-out application and the claimants liable for the costs of the amendment application, several factors warranted consideration, including that both applications were heard together, the defendants later consented to amended particulars, and the hearing facilitated the eventual mediation. The court assessed the claimants’ recoverable costs at £4,597.44 and the defendants’ costs at £493.32, resulting in a net payment of £4,104.12 due from the defendants to the claimants.


Family proceedings

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll