header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 26 January 2024

Barrister

Ahmed v Rehman [2023] EWCA Civ 1504, [2024] All ER (D) 35 (Jan)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed an appeal by the appellant barrister from a decision to commit him to prison for six weeks and fined £9,000 for breach of an undertaking to the court. The committal application had been made against an LLP, however the appellant had been sentenced. The court had jurisdiction to commit not only an LLP but also its principals. But it could only exercise that jurisdiction over any particular individual if the procedural requirements for a committal had been complied with, or waived. There were serious deficiencies in the procedure adopted on the present occasion. However egregious the conduct of an alleged contemnor, he was entitled to the procedural protection afforded by the rules. The appeal should be allowed on procedural grounds.


Contempt of court

UK Insurance Ltd v Ali and others [2024] EWHC 30 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 41 (Jan)

The King’s Bench Division (the court) ruled on the claimant insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll