header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 26 January 2024

Barrister

Ahmed v Rehman [2023] EWCA Civ 1504, [2024] All ER (D) 35 (Jan)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed an appeal by the appellant barrister from a decision to commit him to prison for six weeks and fined £9,000 for breach of an undertaking to the court. The committal application had been made against an LLP, however the appellant had been sentenced. The court had jurisdiction to commit not only an LLP but also its principals. But it could only exercise that jurisdiction over any particular individual if the procedural requirements for a committal had been complied with, or waived. There were serious deficiencies in the procedure adopted on the present occasion. However egregious the conduct of an alleged contemnor, he was entitled to the procedural protection afforded by the rules. The appeal should be allowed on procedural grounds.


Contempt of court

UK Insurance Ltd v Ali and others [2024] EWHC 30 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 41 (Jan)

The King’s Bench Division (the court) ruled on the claimant insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll