header-logo header-logo

Negligence—Causation—Breach of duty causing or materially contributing to damage

26 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Gray v Thames Trains and others [2009] UKHL 33, [2009] All ER (D) 162 (Jun)

House of Lords, Lord Phillips, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott,
Lord Rodger and Lord Brown, 17 June 2009

The House of Lords has applied the wider version of the maxim ex turpi causa in holding that one cannot recover compensation for loss which one has suffered in consequence of one’s own criminal act.

Anthony Scrivener QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by Collins) for the claimant. Christopher Purchas QC and Steven Snowden (instructed by Halliwells LLP) for the defendants.

The claimant was a victim of the Ladbroke Grove rail crash of October 1999. He sustained minor physical injuries but developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which led to depression and to a significant change in his personality. On 19 August 2001, he fatally stabbed a stranger. The claimant surrendered to the police the following day.

He pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility. The judge ordered the claimant to be detained in hospital. The claimant commenced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll