header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Negligence—Causation—Breach of duty causing or materially contributing to damage

Gray v Thames Trains and others [2009] UKHL 33, [2009] All ER (D) 162 (Jun)

House of Lords, Lord Phillips, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott,
Lord Rodger and Lord Brown, 17 June 2009

The House of Lords has applied the wider version of the maxim ex turpi causa in holding that one cannot recover compensation for loss which one has suffered in consequence of one’s own criminal act.

Anthony Scrivener QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by Collins) for the claimant. Christopher Purchas QC and Steven Snowden (instructed by Halliwells LLP) for the defendants.

The claimant was a victim of the Ladbroke Grove rail crash of October 1999. He sustained minor physical injuries but developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which led to depression and to a significant change in his personality. On 19 August 2001, he fatally stabbed a stranger. The claimant surrendered to the police the following day.

He pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility. The judge ordered the claimant to be detained in hospital. The claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll