header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Negligence—Causation—Breach of duty causing or materially contributing to damage

Gray v Thames Trains and others [2009] UKHL 33, [2009] All ER (D) 162 (Jun)

House of Lords, Lord Phillips, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott,
Lord Rodger and Lord Brown, 17 June 2009

The House of Lords has applied the wider version of the maxim ex turpi causa in holding that one cannot recover compensation for loss which one has suffered in consequence of one’s own criminal act.

Anthony Scrivener QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by Collins) for the claimant. Christopher Purchas QC and Steven Snowden (instructed by Halliwells LLP) for the defendants.

The claimant was a victim of the Ladbroke Grove rail crash of October 1999. He sustained minor physical injuries but developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which led to depression and to a significant change in his personality. On 19 August 2001, he fatally stabbed a stranger. The claimant surrendered to the police the following day.

He pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility. The judge ordered the claimant to be detained in hospital. The claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll