header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law Reports

Employment—Equal pay for equal work—Police shift workers

Blackburn and another v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police[2008] EWCA Civ 1208, [2008] All ER (D) 50 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Scott Baker, Maurice Kay and Wilson
LJJ, 6 November 2008

The fact that some female police officers with childcare responsibilities are excused working on a 24/7 rotating shift pattern, due to their childcare responsibilities, and thereby do not receive the special priority payment awarded to officers who do work the rotating shift pattern, does not amount to unlawful discrimination contrary to the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970).

Robin Allen QC and Rachel Crasnow (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) for the employees. Elizabeth Slade QC and Andrew Blake (instructed by West Midlands Police Legal Services Department) for the employer.

The employees were female police officers in the West Midlands Police. They were “sector” or “front line” officers. Although such officers were generally required to work a 24/7 rotating shift pattern, the employees were excused from that by reason of their childcare responsibilities. Sector officers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll