header-logo header-logo

Law Reports

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment—Equal pay for equal work—Police shift workers

Blackburn and another v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police[2008] EWCA Civ 1208, [2008] All ER (D) 50 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Scott Baker, Maurice Kay and Wilson
LJJ, 6 November 2008

The fact that some female police officers with childcare responsibilities are excused working on a 24/7 rotating shift pattern, due to their childcare responsibilities, and thereby do not receive the special priority payment awarded to officers who do work the rotating shift pattern, does not amount to unlawful discrimination contrary to the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970).

Robin Allen QC and Rachel Crasnow (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) for the employees. Elizabeth Slade QC and Andrew Blake (instructed by West Midlands Police Legal Services Department) for the employer.

The employees were female police officers in the West Midlands Police. They were “sector” or “front line” officers. Although such officers were generally required to work a 24/7 rotating shift pattern, the employees were excused from that by reason of their childcare responsibilities. Sector officers who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll