header-logo header-logo

Law Society plans further legal action against LSC

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The battle over the controversial unified legal aid contracts intensi­fied this week with the Law Society threatening another law suit against the Legal Services Commission (LSC) over its stance on the issue.

In a letter before claim this week, the society’s solicitors, Bircham Dyson Bell (BDB), says the society will seek judicial review to force the LSC to honour its obliga­tions under EU law.

The warning follows the soci­ety’s win in the Court of Appeal in November last year, when the court ruled that contract provisions which would have allowed the LSC to unilaterally amend the contract broke EU procurement laws.

In December 2007, the LSC announced its intention to termi­nate the unified contract and in the meantime consider amending the offending provisions in the contract. However, says BDB, the LSC does not plan any action to nullify the consequences of its unlawful action and is relying on “misconceived” arguments to justify its position.

Since the LSC has failed to adequately address the society’s concerns, the letter dated 24 Janu­ary says court action may be the only answer, although mediation may be considered “but not at the cost of introducing further unaccept­able delay”.

The society wants declara­tions from the court that the LSC is obliged to nullify the consequences of its breach of EU law, and that the amendments purportedly made by the LSC to the unified contract have no contractual effect.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll