header-logo header-logo

Law Society plans further legal action against LSC

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The battle over the controversial unified legal aid contracts intensi­fied this week with the Law Society threatening another law suit against the Legal Services Commission (LSC) over its stance on the issue.

In a letter before claim this week, the society’s solicitors, Bircham Dyson Bell (BDB), says the society will seek judicial review to force the LSC to honour its obliga­tions under EU law.

The warning follows the soci­ety’s win in the Court of Appeal in November last year, when the court ruled that contract provisions which would have allowed the LSC to unilaterally amend the contract broke EU procurement laws.

In December 2007, the LSC announced its intention to termi­nate the unified contract and in the meantime consider amending the offending provisions in the contract. However, says BDB, the LSC does not plan any action to nullify the consequences of its unlawful action and is relying on “misconceived” arguments to justify its position.

Since the LSC has failed to adequately address the society’s concerns, the letter dated 24 Janu­ary says court action may be the only answer, although mediation may be considered “but not at the cost of introducing further unaccept­able delay”.

The society wants declara­tions from the court that the LSC is obliged to nullify the consequences of its breach of EU law, and that the amendments purportedly made by the LSC to the unified contract have no contractual effect.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll