header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Law Society plans further legal action against LSC

The battle over the controversial unified legal aid contracts intensi­fied this week with the Law Society threatening another law suit against the Legal Services Commission (LSC) over its stance on the issue.

In a letter before claim this week, the society’s solicitors, Bircham Dyson Bell (BDB), says the society will seek judicial review to force the LSC to honour its obliga­tions under EU law.

The warning follows the soci­ety’s win in the Court of Appeal in November last year, when the court ruled that contract provisions which would have allowed the LSC to unilaterally amend the contract broke EU procurement laws.

In December 2007, the LSC announced its intention to termi­nate the unified contract and in the meantime consider amending the offending provisions in the contract. However, says BDB, the LSC does not plan any action to nullify the consequences of its unlawful action and is relying on “misconceived” arguments to justify its position.

Since the LSC has failed to adequately address the society’s concerns, the letter dated 24 Janu­ary says court action may be the only answer, although mediation may be considered “but not at the cost of introducing further unaccept­able delay”.

The society wants declara­tions from the court that the LSC is obliged to nullify the consequences of its breach of EU law, and that the amendments purportedly made by the LSC to the unified contract have no contractual effect.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll