header-logo header-logo

Lawson v Serco revisited

15 July 2010 / Melanie Adams
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Melanie Adams considers when employees working abroad may bring unfair dismissal claims

Ismail Ravat joined Halliburton, a British registered company that is a subsidiary of a large US multinational corporation, in 1990 as an accounts manager. From 1995, he worked outside the UK, first in Algeria and from March 2003 in Libya for an associated German company. He was retained on normal UK pay and pensions structure, was paid in sterling into a UK bank account and paid UK tax and national insurance, although his salary was recharged to the German company who decided his salary increases and bonuses.

Work patterns

Mr Ravat’s work pattern was in accordance with Halliburton’s “international commuter assignment policy”, which differed from the company’s arrangements for expatriates who not only worked but also lived abroad. He worked on a rotational four weeks on/four weeks off basis, spending the four weeks off at home in the UK, during which he voluntarily dealt with work-related e-mail for a minimal amount of his time. UK employment law was the express governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll