header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Melanie Adams
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Lawson v Serco revisited

Melanie Adams considers when employees working abroad may bring unfair dismissal claims

Ismail Ravat joined Halliburton, a British registered company that is a subsidiary of a large US multinational corporation, in 1990 as an accounts manager. From 1995, he worked outside the UK, first in Algeria and from March 2003 in Libya for an associated German company. He was retained on normal UK pay and pensions structure, was paid in sterling into a UK bank account and paid UK tax and national insurance, although his salary was recharged to the German company who decided his salary increases and bonuses.

Work patterns

Mr Ravat’s work pattern was in accordance with Halliburton’s “international commuter assignment policy”, which differed from the company’s arrangements for expatriates who not only worked but also lived abroad. He worked on a rotational four weeks on/four weeks off basis, spending the four weeks off at home in the UK, during which he voluntarily dealt with work-related e-mail for a minimal amount of his time. UK employment law was the express governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll