header-logo header-logo

Lawson v Serco revisited

15 July 2010 / Melanie Adams
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Melanie Adams considers when employees working abroad may bring unfair dismissal claims

Ismail Ravat joined Halliburton, a British registered company that is a subsidiary of a large US multinational corporation, in 1990 as an accounts manager. From 1995, he worked outside the UK, first in Algeria and from March 2003 in Libya for an associated German company. He was retained on normal UK pay and pensions structure, was paid in sterling into a UK bank account and paid UK tax and national insurance, although his salary was recharged to the German company who decided his salary increases and bonuses.

Work patterns

Mr Ravat’s work pattern was in accordance with Halliburton’s “international commuter assignment policy”, which differed from the company’s arrangements for expatriates who not only worked but also lived abroad. He worked on a rotational four weeks on/four weeks off basis, spending the four weeks off at home in the UK, during which he voluntarily dealt with work-related e-mail for a minimal amount of his time. UK employment law was the express governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll