header-logo header-logo

Lawson v Serco revisited

15 July 2010 / Melanie Adams
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Melanie Adams considers when employees working abroad may bring unfair dismissal claims

Ismail Ravat joined Halliburton, a British registered company that is a subsidiary of a large US multinational corporation, in 1990 as an accounts manager. From 1995, he worked outside the UK, first in Algeria and from March 2003 in Libya for an associated German company. He was retained on normal UK pay and pensions structure, was paid in sterling into a UK bank account and paid UK tax and national insurance, although his salary was recharged to the German company who decided his salary increases and bonuses.

Work patterns

Mr Ravat’s work pattern was in accordance with Halliburton’s “international commuter assignment policy”, which differed from the company’s arrangements for expatriates who not only worked but also lived abroad. He worked on a rotational four weeks on/four weeks off basis, spending the four weeks off at home in the UK, during which he voluntarily dealt with work-related e-mail for a minimal amount of his time. UK employment law was the express governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll