header-logo header-logo

Legal access could help children deprived of liberty

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-detail
Increasing numbers of deprivation of liberty orders are being made against children, family law campaigners have warned. Yet, in the majority of cases, the parents or carers concerned have no access to legal advice

The charity, Family Rights Group is running a campaign to highlight these orders, which can be made by the family court if a local authority is concerned about risks to the child’s safety or the safety of others. Backing the campaign last week, the Law Society also expressed concern about the lack of legal aid for families.

Statistics published by Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) in September showed 1,249 children were subject to the orders in the year to June 2023. The NFJO found that 88.5% of parents and carers were not represented at any hearings in applications made under the High Court’s jurisdiction. NFJO also reported children were sent more than 56 miles away on average to children’s homes, care home services or unregulated placements. 

Deprivation of Liberty Orders allow for children to be placed under severe restrictions. There was a 462% increase in these cases in the three years to 2020/21.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘A parent whose child is subject to care proceedings is entitled to non-means-tested legal aid.

‘However, the same cannot be said for deprivation of liberty cases. Families are instead faced with a stringent means and merits test to establish if they can receive legal aid.

‘We call on the government to remove these barriers.’

Emmerson said: ‘The family court system is facing an increase in deprivation of liberty cases due to a reduction in the number of children in youth custody, a rise in the number of older children coming into care, falling numbers of inpatient child mental health beds and the closure of secure children’s homes.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll