header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid: humans & justice must come first

Successive governments have reduced legal aid to the level of ‘mundane horse trading of practical politics’, says Geoffrey Bindman QC.

In an article this week, the NLJ columnist says legal aid was dealt its heaviest blow by LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) but the recent Bach Commission proposal for a new Right to Justice Act offers fresh hope.

‘By a striking coincidence the constitutional supremacy of access to justice has almost simultaneously been re-asserted by the Supreme Court in Unison v Lord Chancellor [where employment tribunal fees were held to be unlawful],’ he writes. ‘In outlawing the imposition of oppressive fees in employment tribunals the court highlighted the right of all citizens to access to justice as a fundamental constitutional principle.’ (See Comment)

Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll