header-logo header-logo

Legal bodies issue judicial review plea

27 November 2014
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council, the Law Society and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) have urged MPs to protect judicial review.

Writing to all MPs this week, the legal bodies argue that restricting judicial review will diminish constituents’ ability to challenge public authority decision-making on things which matter to them.

Part 4 of the Government’s Criminal Justice and Courts Bill will make it harder to challenge unlawful decision-making by government and public bodies, however, peers from all main parties last month amended the Bill, protecting judicial review from this legislative attack. The Lords amendments are due to be debated in a Commons vote next week.

Frances Edwards, president of CILEx says: “The amendments made by their lordships enable judges to apply tougher rules in appropriate cases, and not apply them where to do so would be wrong. This discretion is best held by the judge hearing the case.”

Commenting on the proposal to force judges to make intervening bodies in judicial review pay costs, Law Society president, Andrew Caplen, says: “Expert organisations do not wade in to judicial reviews for fun. The judge must first give them permission to make an intervention, and they do so because their expertise helps judges make more informed decisions. The government’s plan will have a chilling effect on organisations who do this important work at their own expense.”

Issue: 7632 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll