header-logo header-logo

02 March 2022
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Legal News , International justice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Legal profession supports Ukraine

Lawyers condemn ‘act of war’ and warn of exposure to sanctions

Lawyers have expressed solidarity with Ukraine and called on the government to assist refugees.

In a joint statement, Bar leaders in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland and the Faculty of Advocates in Scotland, unequivocally condemned the invasion as an ‘act of war’ and ‘a gross violation of international law’.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The Law Society stands in solidarity with the Ukrainian people, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Ukrainian Bar Association.

‘We also stand with the Russian people who oppose their government’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, and lawyers who are defending the rule of law in the region.’

Meanwhile, lawyers have been advised to keep a close eye on client exposure to Russian sanctions, including in supply chains.

Pinsent Masons senior associate Stacy Keen, a specialist in sanctions, said any ramping-up of sanctions is likely to affect a far wider range of businesses than previous sector-based measures, hitting not just UK oil exploration and production companies but other strategic sectors such as the information, communications and digital technologies sectors.

‘Businesses should plan on the basis that the sanctions already announced are just the first wave,’ Keen said.

‘They should urgently be identifying not just Russian and Ukrainian business partners but also non-Russian/Ukrainian counterparties that have a significant exposure to these countries.’

However, reports this week that Foreign Secretary Liz Truss briefed MPs that London law firms are delaying sanctions against Russian oligarchs prompted raised eyebrows in the profession.

Human rights barrister Jessica Simor QC tweeted: ‘Law firms can’t hold it up. Only a court could. Are there any court orders? I doubt it.’

Boyce responded, on behalf of the Law Society: ‘It’s the job of solicitors to represent their clients, whoever they may be, so that the courts act fairly. 

‘This is how the public can be confident they live in a country that respects the rule of law―unlike Putin’s tyrannical regime. Solicitors are highly regulated and are not allowed to bring spurious objections to processes―if they challenge the government’s actions, it’s because they think the government is at risk of breaking its own rules.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll