header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal reactions to Reality TV

Advice for debtors faced with bailiffs & a camera crew

Reality TV has thrown up new challenges for debt lawyers as well as a never-ending cast of “wannabes”. Defamation and privacy actions are two possible means of recourse for anyone who finds bailiffs and a camera crew at their front door, according to barrister Stephen Boyd, of Selborne Chambers, writing in this week’s NLJ

“In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor,” he says. 

“This would be actionable, if false.” However, existing caselaw makes this line of attack unlikely to succeed.

Boyd offers advice on what the debtor should do when first confronted, and in the following days. “Consideration should be given to challenging the right of the television company to screen what footage they have on the basis of breach of the subject’s Art 8 rights. 

They should be asked to provide, say, 10 days’ notice of their intention to screen the film so that appropriate steps can be taken to apply for an injunction,” he says.

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll