header-logo header-logo

03 September 2021 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Levelling up access to justice (Pt 3)

56052
In the third instalment of this series, Roger Smith tackles access to justice, the courts & the slow march of digitalisation

Let us approach the issue of access to justice, technology and the courts elliptically. We will first digress to a recently published paper from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism: ‘Justice for sale: how London’s legal system courted the global super-elite’ (bit.ly/2VUcge). This reports on the government-led drive to get more Russian and other oligarchs into our courts. The Lord Chancellor wants more glittering bonanzas like Berezovsky v Abramovich [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 116 (Sep), where any moral unease at the conduct of the parties melts away at the eye-watering size of the lucrative court and lawyer fees. And to achieve this, the courts have to contribute a modern service to commercial standards. We have to ask whether the pitch for remunerative, high-fee international work is being made at the expense of smaller domestic claims. This raises five issues.

Counting the costs

First,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll