header-logo header-logo

Levelling up access to justice (Pt 3)

03 September 2021 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
56052
In the third instalment of this series, Roger Smith tackles access to justice, the courts & the slow march of digitalisation

Let us approach the issue of access to justice, technology and the courts elliptically. We will first digress to a recently published paper from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism: ‘Justice for sale: how London’s legal system courted the global super-elite’ (bit.ly/2VUcge). This reports on the government-led drive to get more Russian and other oligarchs into our courts. The Lord Chancellor wants more glittering bonanzas like Berezovsky v Abramovich [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 116 (Sep), where any moral unease at the conduct of the parties melts away at the eye-watering size of the lucrative court and lawyer fees. And to achieve this, the courts have to contribute a modern service to commercial standards. We have to ask whether the pitch for remunerative, high-fee international work is being made at the expense of smaller domestic claims. This raises five issues.

Counting the costs

First,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll