header-logo header-logo

03 September 2021 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Levelling up access to justice (Pt 3)

56052
In the third instalment of this series, Roger Smith tackles access to justice, the courts & the slow march of digitalisation

Let us approach the issue of access to justice, technology and the courts elliptically. We will first digress to a recently published paper from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism: ‘Justice for sale: how London’s legal system courted the global super-elite’ (bit.ly/2VUcge). This reports on the government-led drive to get more Russian and other oligarchs into our courts. The Lord Chancellor wants more glittering bonanzas like Berezovsky v Abramovich [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 116 (Sep), where any moral unease at the conduct of the parties melts away at the eye-watering size of the lucrative court and lawyer fees. And to achieve this, the courts have to contribute a modern service to commercial standards. We have to ask whether the pitch for remunerative, high-fee international work is being made at the expense of smaller domestic claims. This raises five issues.

Counting the costs

First,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll