header-logo header-logo

27 March 2008 / Alex Craig
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Public , Data protection , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Life after death?

Alex Craig examines how the case of Peter Pan might impact on the future of copyright protection

“All children, except one, grow up...” This is the opening sentence of a captivating story most of us will be familiar with—the story of Peter Pan, a young boy who declined adulthood, creating his own world of Indians, pirates and fairies. Although staying safe in Never-Never Land helped him avoid entering the grown-up world, one thing that couldn’t be avoided was the inevitable expiration of copyright in the work in which he appears. On 31 December 2007 copyright in Peter Pan expired in theory, making it freely available to the general public. This would have had severe repercussions had the author, JM Barrie, not bequeathed all rights to the work to in 1929. ’s reasons are subject to some debate, but it is assumed that wanted rights in his works to pass to an organisation that would entertain and look after the one thing in life that most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll