header-logo header-logo

Line up

10094385_4

Ian Smith observes the plight of those seeking justice in employment tribunals

The cases commented on in this epistle are particularly diverse, and served to amuse those of us still at the coalface rather than in Tuscany during the dog days of the last month. The first concerns whistleblowing (in the context of human rights) and the second is another equal pay case making the point that ultimately the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970) is there to secure equal pay, not fair wages (though in an unusual manner). The third and fourth cases illustrate the fundamental truth that you can go for years without a decision on a particular statutory provision and then suddenly have it brought back into focus.

Whistleblowing

Heinisch v Germany (App No 28274/08) concerned the potential application of Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) to a case of what in this jurisdiction would be considered whistleblowing. A geriatric nurse had made several complaints to the management about poor care

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll