header-logo header-logo

02 February 2023
Categories: Legal News , Public , Highways , Criminal
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Lords propose changes to Public Order Bill

The House of Lords has once again commenced checking of the Public Order Bill (which aims to strengthen police powers to tackle protesters) on Monday 30 January.

Lexis®Library update: Proposed changes at this report stage include amending penalties for obstructing highways, reasonable excuse defences for acts carried out as part of trade disputes and protecting rights to privacy and private property.

Two divisions on proposed changes include clarification of 'serious disruption' in amendment one, for which 243 voted in favour and 221 against and limiting the scope of 'reasonable excuse' in amendment eight for which 221 voted for and 243 against. The former change has been made and the latter has not. Members have also agreed to changes put forward by the government. Further amendments will be discussed at the second day of report stage which has not yet been scheduled.

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 1 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll