header-logo header-logo

27 March 2008 / Anthony Judge
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Look before you leap

Anthony Judge offers some practical advice to negotiating the minefield of insolvency purchasing

In this economic climate, property speculators are shopping for cut-price properties being sold by distressed sellers, and we are starting to see insolvency-related sales. When property is marketed by an agent on behalf of an insolvency practitioner (IP) the burden of verification is on the buyer, who must conduct due diligence investigations. Sales particulars from the IP tend to provide little information. A key duty of an IP is to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the assets he is selling. IPs frequently conduct parallel negotiations with a number of interested buyers and contract races are not unusual.

 

THE PURCHASE CONTRACT

The IP’s lawyers will prepare the first draft contract and transfer with no covenants, warranties or indemnities in favour of the buyer. The extent to which this is negotiable will depend on relative bargaining positions. Because title to the assets remains with the company, the company will be the contracting party (acting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll