header-logo header-logo

Lord Chief Justice speaks out on career planning for judges

02 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges are unlikely to hear the outcome of a review into their salaries until “into 2018”, the Lord Chief Justice has said.

Speaking at his annual press conference last week, Lord Thomas also backed more high-level career progression in the judiciary, including appraisal and career planning.

He said he doubted whether the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) would report “until into 2018”.

“What we are looking for is an interim measure and then a proper examination,” he said.

“The last review which took place in 2011 was never implemented and this time I think there is a much greater all round, and I am very grateful to the chairman of the SSRB for this, he feels that really we must do a proper job and then do everything possible to implement the recommendations.”

On career progression, he noted that people are entering the judiciary in their late thirties and therefore the judiciary needed to explore what those people were interested in, “absolutely introduce appraisal” and introduce “some idea of career planning”.

“I am very anxious to make certain that whatever age, but particularly the young when they enter the judiciary, can see a variety of work,” he said.

“They may have started in a tribunal or started as a district judge and they may want to do different things and I think we ought to make that possible.”

Lord Thomas struck a cautious note on the danger of paid McKenzie Friends “preying on vulnerable people”.

“One has to bear in mind, and I have seen this both in crime and in immigration, that someone who is under threat of removal or is accused of a serious crime is extremely vulnerable and it is very easy for someone to say, ‘Come on, I can help you,’” he said.

“I have seen them [helping in immigration cases], who give legal advice that is simply wrong and you are preying on vulnerable people and that is why I am very, very cautious about payment to non-lawyers who try and assist vulnerable people. There is a real risk of exploitation or of giving advice the person wants to hear, not advice that they do not want to hear.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll