header-logo header-logo

Lottery appeal dismissed but may spin consumer rethink

06 March 2024
Issue: 8062 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer
printer mail-detail

A Court of Appeal judge has suggested the Law Commission reviews consumer law after dismissing an appeal by a lottery player whose £1m win turned out to be a computer glitch

Parker-Grennan v Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 185 concerned an instant win game on the National Lottery website. She clicked ‘confirm’ to agree to the terms and conditions—a link at the bottom of the page led to the small print with hyperlinks to other terms—and played the game. The animations appeared to show she had won £1m—she quickly took a screenshot and rang Camelot without clicking ‘Finish’. Camelot told her she must click ‘Finish’ to complete the game. Sadly, when she did so, the screen showed she had only won £10.

The mistake was due to a coding issue, which generated an error in the Java software.

Joan Parker-Grennan sued for £1m, contending she followed the rules and any software error was Camelot’s problem, not hers. The High Court held for Camelot. The claimant’s appeal raised three issues: (i) Were Camelot’s terms incorporated in the contract? (ii) If so, were certain of those terms rendered unenforceable by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999? (iii) And as a matter of construction, did she win £1m or £10?

Giving the main judgment, Lady Justice Andrews held the claimant won £10 only, the terms were effectively incorporated, and none were onerous, unusual or unfair.

However, Andrews LJ said the case ‘squarely raised the issue of what needs to be done to incorporate standard terms and conditions into a contract for goods or services which is made online’.

‘So far as we are aware,’ she said, ‘this is the first case in which that issue has been considered by this court.’

She concluded: ‘The issues in this case have highlighted the complexity of balancing the needs of traders to publicise their terms and conditions with the needs of consumers to access and understand those terms. Given that a decade has passed since the last report of the Law Commission the time might be ripe for another, evidence-based, review of this area of law.’

Issue: 8062 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must overhaul its complaints and risk assessment processes to fix ‘systemic shortcomings’, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has said
The opt-out collective actions regime is facing ‘significant challenges’ but could benefit the UK by £24bn a year if enhanced and expanded, a report by Stephenson Harwood has found
Ministers have rejected the Justice Committee review’s key recommendation for the ailing county court system—an ‘urgent and comprehensive’ review by spring at the latest
Firms preparing to mount Mazur applications alleging the other side has acted in breach of the Legal Services Act 2007 may be left disappointed, the Law Society has said
The first Post Office Capture conviction—the accounting software used before the faulty Horizon system—has been referred for appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)
back-to-top-scroll