header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 November 2007 / Toby Starr
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

MAD for it?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Are lawyers to blame for the Northern Rock fiasco?
Toby Starr reports

The Market Abuse Directive 2003/6/EC, shortened to MAD by those who dislike legislation against insider trading, was intended to ensure that quoted firms were transparent with their investors and the market.
As was widely reported, on 20 September 2007 the governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, blamed MAD for preventing the bank from stepping in to help Northern Rock when he told the House of Commons Treasury Committee that “we were unable to carry out a lender-of-last-resort operation in the way we would have done in the 1990s, as a result of the Market Abuse Directive”. This was, said King, a major reason why the bank was unable to avert “the run on the Rock”.

During September, alongside the pictures of queuing savers, a public wrangle developed over the legal advice King had taken. The European Commission said that King’s advice was wrong and that there was sufficient “flexibility” in MAD for Northern Rock to keep information out of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll