header-logo header-logo

Meet the parents

27 March 2008 / Shenna Parry
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Assisted reproduction is leading the law on parentage into confusion, says Sheena Parry

L ord Alton, speaking in the House of Lords in January, raised a case purportedly involving twins, separately adopted at birth, who unknowingly married each other. The truth of the story has since been doubted, as there is no reference to such a case in any law reports. However far-fetched this may seem, with the growth of “reproductive tourism” and advances in assisted reproduction techniques, is the prospect of similar cases becoming more likely?

Adopted children are allowed access to some information about their natural parents, and this has recently been extended to include those conceived as a result of donor insemination, who, when aged 18 or over, may make an application to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for information under s 31(4) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1991. Prior to 1991 a voluntary database ukdonorlink.org.uk is available which provides an information exchange for donors and children conceived by a donor.

Unfortunately, those born as a result

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll