header-logo header-logo

27 March 2008 / Shenna Parry
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Meet the parents

Assisted reproduction is leading the law on parentage into confusion, says Sheena Parry

L ord Alton, speaking in the House of Lords in January, raised a case purportedly involving twins, separately adopted at birth, who unknowingly married each other. The truth of the story has since been doubted, as there is no reference to such a case in any law reports. However far-fetched this may seem, with the growth of “reproductive tourism” and advances in assisted reproduction techniques, is the prospect of similar cases becoming more likely?

Adopted children are allowed access to some information about their natural parents, and this has recently been extended to include those conceived as a result of donor insemination, who, when aged 18 or over, may make an application to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for information under s 31(4) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1991. Prior to 1991 a voluntary database ukdonorlink.org.uk is available which provides an information exchange for donors and children conceived by a donor.

Unfortunately, those born as a result

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll