header-logo header-logo

Men win landmark equal pay claim

02 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment

Councils will have to review their pay structures after a landmark equal pay discrimination ruling in a claim brought by men against higher paid male colleagues.

In McAvoy and Ors v Llewellyn and Ors the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that 300 men working in jobs such as care assistants, caretakers and leisure attendants were entitled to the same pay as men in better paid jobs such as gardeners and refuse collectors, who received bonuses.
The men lodged their equal pay claim at the same time as a group of women. The women were successful but the men were not. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has now redressed the balance, in a decision that opens the gates to about 12,000 similar claims by men.

Barrister Yvette Genn, from Cloisters, says: “This is an important decision as it demonstrates that equal pay laws can be applied not only by women who compare themselves with men, but also by men who are comparing themselves with better paid men. There is no doubt that many of the similar 12,000 cases in the system will now proceed and are likely to be successful.
“First the Employment Tribunal and now the Employment Appeal Tribunal has made it clear that the position adopted by South Tyneside Council is simply unacceptable. Councils up and down the country will now have to undertake a pay review following this decision. ”

Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll