header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Mental health

Re D (statutory will) [2010] EWHC 2159 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 102 (Aug)

Even if all relevant parties consented to the terms of the proposed statutory will, that could not be conclusive because the execution of a will for a protected person was a decision which had to be made by the court itself, and could not be entrusted to a deputy.

In determining whether to order the execution of a statutory will for and on behalf of a person who lacked capacity, the court had to act in that person’s “best interests”. That concept was explained in s 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which required the court to consider all the relevant circumstances and, in particular, to apply a structured decision making process. The concerns identified by the district judge were factors which the court could take into account when deciding whether to order the execution of a statutory will; and they might, in an appropriate case, lead the court to conclude that it should not exercise its power to do so. However, there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll