header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Mental health

Re D (statutory will) [2010] EWHC 2159 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 102 (Aug)

Even if all relevant parties consented to the terms of the proposed statutory will, that could not be conclusive because the execution of a will for a protected person was a decision which had to be made by the court itself, and could not be entrusted to a deputy.

In determining whether to order the execution of a statutory will for and on behalf of a person who lacked capacity, the court had to act in that person’s “best interests”. That concept was explained in s 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which required the court to consider all the relevant circumstances and, in particular, to apply a structured decision making process. The concerns identified by the district judge were factors which the court could take into account when deciding whether to order the execution of a statutory will; and they might, in an appropriate case, lead the court to conclude that it should not exercise its power to do so. However, there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll