header-logo header-logo

MI5 evidence under investigation

19 February 2025
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The security service MI5 has apologised in court, having admitted to misleading judges in a series of cases in the High Court and in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) about the conduct of one of its agents.

MI5 relied on its ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policy to protect its undercover operatives to avoid disclosing the agent’s identity in court. This was in response to a 2022 claim brought by ‘Beth’, the agent’s former partner, alleging MI5 breached her human rights by recruiting a man who posed a serious risk to women and children.

However, the BBC has revealed it possesses an audio recording of a senior secret services official voluntarily disclosing to a journalist that Beth’s ex-partner is an MI5 recruit.

In a High Court hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain last week, Sir James Eadie KC submitted that an internal disciplinary investigation was underway. Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the Government Legal Service, has been appointed to lead an external review.

Chamberlain J noted the investigations would need to address whether MI5 had ‘deliberately’ given false evidence in 2022.

Kate Ellis, solicitor at Centre for Women’s Justice, representing Beth since 2022, said the revelations were ‘concerning and truly extraordinary.

‘We now understand that MI5 has misled three courts by giving or relying on false evidence—over a period of several years—and this has allowed them to avoid giving “Beth” any meaningful answers.

‘Most concerning of all perhaps is that the truth has only emerged at all because of a secret recording made by the BBC.

‘This exceptionally serious situation has wide implications, for Beth’s case and for the general public. It will leave many wondering whether evidence given by MI5 in legal proceedings—which the courts are expected to treat with particular deference, and which is often heard in secret—can ever be considered reliable.’

Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll