header-logo header-logo

19 February 2025
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-detail

MI5 evidence under investigation

The security service MI5 has apologised in court, having admitted to misleading judges in a series of cases in the High Court and in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) about the conduct of one of its agents.

MI5 relied on its ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policy to protect its undercover operatives to avoid disclosing the agent’s identity in court. This was in response to a 2022 claim brought by ‘Beth’, the agent’s former partner, alleging MI5 breached her human rights by recruiting a man who posed a serious risk to women and children.

However, the BBC has revealed it possesses an audio recording of a senior secret services official voluntarily disclosing to a journalist that Beth’s ex-partner is an MI5 recruit.

In a High Court hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain last week, Sir James Eadie KC submitted that an internal disciplinary investigation was underway. Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the Government Legal Service, has been appointed to lead an external review.

Chamberlain J noted the investigations would need to address whether MI5 had ‘deliberately’ given false evidence in 2022.

Kate Ellis, solicitor at Centre for Women’s Justice, representing Beth since 2022, said the revelations were ‘concerning and truly extraordinary.

‘We now understand that MI5 has misled three courts by giving or relying on false evidence—over a period of several years—and this has allowed them to avoid giving “Beth” any meaningful answers.

‘Most concerning of all perhaps is that the truth has only emerged at all because of a secret recording made by the BBC.

‘This exceptionally serious situation has wide implications, for Beth’s case and for the general public. It will leave many wondering whether evidence given by MI5 in legal proceedings—which the courts are expected to treat with particular deference, and which is often heard in secret—can ever be considered reliable.’

Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll