header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 April 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The missing links

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

David Greene explores the gaps in the LASPO Bill

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill is awaiting Royal Assent and we can now see the shape of the forthcoming Act.

Omissions

The Bill does not contain any provisions for two structural parts of the Jackson reforms—the 10% increase in general damages and qualified one-way cost shifting (QOCS). Amendments to do so failed. The increase in damages is to be the subject of extra statutory regulation and QOCS will be regulated by secondary legislation, but many are unclear as to exactly how these are to be affected and their final form.

Lord Justice Jackson recommended that awards of general damages for personal injury should be increased by 10%. This was to ensure that claimants are properly compensated and that damages are not substantially reduced as a result of his proposed reduction in recovery of costs.

There is, however, no provision in the Bill to this effect. Jackson LJ proposed the increase may be imposed in similar fashion to earlier increases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll