header-logo header-logo

27 April 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The missing links

David Greene explores the gaps in the LASPO Bill

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill is awaiting Royal Assent and we can now see the shape of the forthcoming Act.

Omissions

The Bill does not contain any provisions for two structural parts of the Jackson reforms—the 10% increase in general damages and qualified one-way cost shifting (QOCS). Amendments to do so failed. The increase in damages is to be the subject of extra statutory regulation and QOCS will be regulated by secondary legislation, but many are unclear as to exactly how these are to be affected and their final form.

Lord Justice Jackson recommended that awards of general damages for personal injury should be increased by 10%. This was to ensure that claimants are properly compensated and that damages are not substantially reduced as a result of his proposed reduction in recovery of costs.

There is, however, no provision in the Bill to this effect. Jackson LJ proposed the increase may be imposed in similar fashion to earlier increases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll