header-logo header-logo

Integrity v profit: mixed motives?

10 May 2024 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
171865
Solicitors must serve the public as well as their clients, writes Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC

On 19 January 2024, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) issued a statement about the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, which it is investigating. The SRA reminds us that its rules provide that ‘solicitors must work to high professional and ethical standards. This includes upholding the rule of law, acting with integrity, and in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the profession. As officers of the court, solicitors should never put other interests—such as the outcome for their client—above the law and the proper administration of justice.’

I am proud to belong to a profession which upholds such standards, but translating them into enforceable (and enforced) regulation has been problematic. The main reason is the ambiguity of the solicitor’s role. As an integral component of the justice system, solicitors apply their knowledge and skill in mitigating the inability of the legally unskilled to navigate complex rules and procedures. That is a public responsibility.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll