header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

MORE HOLIDAYS

In brief

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has published regulations to boost the minimum holiday entitlement from 20 days a year to 24 days in October, and to 28 days from April 2009. As a transitional measure, companies will be allowed to buy out the additional leave entitlement introduced from October 2007 until 1 April 2009. Part-time workers will be entitled to the extra days on a pro rata basis. Jim Fitzpatrick, DTI Employment Relations Minister, says: “Businesses will benefit too—from reduced absenteeism and a workforce who are more motivated and productive.”

Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll