header-logo header-logo

NDA ban a double-edged sword

09 July 2025
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Non disclosure agreements , Employment , Harassment , Abuse
printer mail-detail
The government is banning employers from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of harassment and abuse

The change will be introduced through an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill.

However, Nikola Southern, partner at Kingsley Napley, warned the ban could have ‘unintended consequences’ by deterring victims from raising complaints and employers from settling claims.

‘Many victims of harassment and discrimination (including of sexual harassment) rely on NDAs to protect their own interests and identity as confidentiality can—and often does—work both ways in settlement agreements,’ Southern said.

‘Victims will have less control over what information about them and their experience makes it into the public domain.’ She said employers might be more inclined to defend the claim to protect their reputation as they may feel the information is likely to come out.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll