header-logo header-logo

A new dawn for disclosure

10 November 2017 / Ed Crosse
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Opinion , E-disclosure , Profession , Budgeting
printer mail-detail
nlj_7769_crosse

It’s time for the profession & the judiciary to engage constructively to create a world class civil disputes regime, say Ed Crosse & David Bridge

Over the past couple of years there has been growing momentum for major change in the approach to disclosure of the courts in England and Wales. The proliferation of data exchanged between people and stored by individuals and companies has left the traditional approach to disclosure looking antiquated. The language of the current rules assumes that hard copy documents will be the norm, with a separate Practice Direction (PD) bolted on to cover electronic documents, which in truth now make up the vast majority. The entitlement to ‘inspect’ documents, rather than receive copies in native format complete with meta-data, is indicative of this, harking back to a period when lawyers visited each others’ offices to view lever arch files of material.

There have, of course, been changes in practice. The courts have accepted the reality of electronic disclosure and methods of searching for documents that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll