header-logo header-logo

10 November 2017 / Ed Crosse
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Opinion , E-disclosure , Profession , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

A new dawn for disclosure

nlj_7769_crosse

It’s time for the profession & the judiciary to engage constructively to create a world class civil disputes regime, say Ed Crosse & David Bridge

Over the past couple of years there has been growing momentum for major change in the approach to disclosure of the courts in England and Wales. The proliferation of data exchanged between people and stored by individuals and companies has left the traditional approach to disclosure looking antiquated. The language of the current rules assumes that hard copy documents will be the norm, with a separate Practice Direction (PD) bolted on to cover electronic documents, which in truth now make up the vast majority. The entitlement to ‘inspect’ documents, rather than receive copies in native format complete with meta-data, is indicative of this, harking back to a period when lawyers visited each others’ offices to view lever arch files of material.

There have, of course, been changes in practice. The courts have accepted the reality of electronic disclosure and methods of searching for documents that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll