header-logo header-logo

ed_crosse_headshot_web

Ed Crosse

Partner

Ed Crosse is president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and & a partner at Simmons & Simmons.

Partner

Ed Crosse is president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and & a partner at Simmons & Simmons.

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

It’s time for the profession & the judiciary to engage constructively to create a world class civil disputes regime, say Ed Crosse & David Bridge

For London to maintain its litigation crown, we cannot rest on past achievements or be complacent, says Ed Crosse

Is it possible to achieve diversity on the bench, asks Ed Crosse

The government must act soon to protect London as a litigation hub, says Ed Crosse

What is London litigation’s place in the post-Brexit world, asks Ed Crosse

It’s time for lawyers to take a constructive view about change, says Ed Crosse

A study in bear taming? Ed Crosse & Dan Hayward discuss recent trends in case management

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll