header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 December 2016 / Ed Crosse
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Procedure & practice , EU , Profession
printer mail-detail

Still number one?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7725_cross

The government must act soon to protect London as a litigation hub, says Ed Crosse

Legal services have been a major success story for the UK. Several studies have confirmed the fact that the UK has established itself as the premier hub for legal services outside the US. IRN’s UK Legal Services Market Report 2016 estimated the value of UK legal services at £32.1bn in 2015. A report by TheCityUK in July 2016 found that the sector’s trade surplus has nearly doubled over the past decade to £3.4bn in 2015, while the sector’s contribution to the UK economy represented 1.6% of GDP, more than agriculture. It also found that the UK accounts for 10% of the global market for legal services and 20% of legal services in Europe.

An enviable position

That last finding is particularly significant. Many jurisdictions in the EU have long envied the income that the UK derives from exporting English law. They currently sense an opportunity to capitalise on uncertainties created by the Brexit vote. Articles have already

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll