header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 May 2025 / Mary Young
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Technology , Privilege
printer mail-detail

New model order: falling short?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
218606
The new model search & imaging order lacks the clarity needed for the digital age, argues Mary Young
  • The revised model search and imaging order brings a much-needed upgrade, but it leaves unresolved gaps around privilege, cloud-based data and enforcement.
  • This article examines what’s changed, what hasn’t and why supervising solicitors still face uncertainty.

In January 2024, I wrote about why the standard format search and imaging orders needed an upgrade to make them fit for purpose in a world where most documentary evidence is in digital form and much of that is stored on cloud-based systems (‘Civil fraud: it’s time for a digital upgrade’, 174 NLJ 8056, p11). My concerns arose in relation to certain gaps in the process that could give rise to uncertainties, in particular in respect of decisions that might need to be made by anyone appointed as a supervising solicitor under a search and/or imaging order.

On 6 April 2025, a new model search and imaging order came into force. The ‘Important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll