header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024 / Mary Young
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Features , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Civil fraud: it’s time for a digital upgrade

154940
In the age of digital data, search orders may have had their day. Mary Young argues that both search & imaging orders need to be redesigned
  • Standard search orders don’t reflect the reality of today’s data landscape. In some cases, imaging or hybrid orders could be more appropriate.
  • Considering some of the practicalities involved in the search and imaging before the order is made, may assist with a more efficient and cost effective exercise.

The courts have reminded us in numerous judgments that the primary purpose of a search order is to preserve evidence. As most documentary evidence is now in digital form, stored on devices or on cloud-based systems, it is usually possible to take an image of the data required without removing anything from premises, and without affecting the data being imaged. As such, it may be that where a search order would have been required in the past, an imaging order or some sort of hybrid order could now be more appropriate.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll