header-logo header-logo

New partnership to help those navigating court alone

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

St Mary’s School of Law has formed a partnership with national charity Support Through Court, which provides free practical and emotional help to people who cannot afford vital legal services or access legal aid.

The partnership will enable Support Through Court to continue its work in London, at the Royal Courts of Justice and Central Family Court, with students contributing to the charity’s work. This will increase Support Through Court’s capacity to help those navigating the court system without legal representation.

Students from St Mary’s will have the opportunity to gain practical work experience through the partnership, through a telephone service, face-to-face appointments, and attending court hearings.

Emma Taylor, chief executive officer at Support Through Court, said: ‘The rising cost of living means that our support is needed more than ever before, whilst also making our services harder to deliver without new partnerships and supporters.

‘We look forward to working with the university to provide practical and emotional support to more people going through court alone as litigants in person. By working in partnership, we can ensure more people have access to justice.’

Charley Dugdale, subject lead for partnerships at St Mary’s School of Law, said: ‘This collaboration not only supports students’ academic journey, but also helps to foster a sense of social responsibility, supporting members of the local community through the complexities of the court system.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll