header-logo header-logo

11 December 2013
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New year, new mediation rules

Mediation to take centre stage as the default ADR technique

Revised International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) rules on commercial mediation are to be introduced in the new year.

According to the ICC, the new rules, which come into force on 1 January, set mediation as the default alternative dispute resolution (ADR) technique, offer practitioners increased support from the body administering the rules, the ICC International Centre for ADR, and will help speed up complex cross-border disputes. They replace the ICC ADR Rules that have been used for dispute resolution worldwide since 2001. 

The rules were revised by a taskforce of 90 specialists from 29 countries, and validated by the ICC’s Commission on Arbitration and ADR. 

Chris Newmark, vice-chair of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR, says the new rules have two important features: “First, the rules themselves offer simplicity by focusing on mediation rather than ADR more generally. Second, the guidance notes give practical guidance, enabling users and their advisers to see how ICC mediation proceedings can be organised and conducted so as to maximise the chances of a successful resolution of the parties’ dispute.”

Meanwhile, practitioners say commercial mediation is on the rise with London emerging as a global hub. Andy Rogers, communications director at CEDR, says: “As with litigation and arbitration, London has, fairly seamlessly, emerged as a global centre of mediation, and it is going from strength to strength.

“Lord Justice Briggs gave an interesting ruling on mediation in PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 [2013] EWCA Civ 1288 [where it was held that silence in response to a bona fide request to mediate can of itself constitute unreasonable conduct]. It’s a very clear message, even more so than the Jackson reforms, and it’s going to be decisions like this that are going to be the driver for mediation becoming even more uniform than it is.

“I hope that wherever mediation aspires towards, it retains that element of flexibility and responsiveness that makes it so popular.”

Rogers says commercial mediation is “very common” among large multinationals, but less so in disputes between smaller businesses. That will be the next area for change following the PGF case, he added.

 

Issue: 7588 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll