header-logo header-logo

The next instalment

03 May 2012 / Joseph Ollech , Adam Rosenthal
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Are future rents payable as an expense in administration, ask Adam Rosenthal & Joseph Ollech

On 28 March 2012 Judge Pelling QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, delivered an ex tempore judgment in several applications made by a number of landlords against administrators of tenants in the Luminar Group, in In Re Luminar Lava Ignite [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch). Luminar went into administration in October 2011, and these applications were concerned first with permission to forfeit, and second with the payment of rent as an expense of the administration.

Application of Goldacre

The case is of interest because of its application of the High Court decision in Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455, [2010] All ER (D) 54 (Jan), an important decision regarding the payment of rent by administrators under the Insolvency Rules, as amended following the enactment of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002).

Goldacre Offices Limited was the landlord of commercial premises which were let under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll