header-logo header-logo

03 May 2012 / Joseph Ollech , Adam Rosenthal
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

The next instalment

Are future rents payable as an expense in administration, ask Adam Rosenthal & Joseph Ollech

On 28 March 2012 Judge Pelling QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, delivered an ex tempore judgment in several applications made by a number of landlords against administrators of tenants in the Luminar Group, in In Re Luminar Lava Ignite [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch). Luminar went into administration in October 2011, and these applications were concerned first with permission to forfeit, and second with the payment of rent as an expense of the administration.

Application of Goldacre

The case is of interest because of its application of the High Court decision in Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455, [2010] All ER (D) 54 (Jan), an important decision regarding the payment of rent by administrators under the Insolvency Rules, as amended following the enactment of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002).

Goldacre Offices Limited was the landlord of commercial premises which were let under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll