header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Kate Parker
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Damages , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The next step

stairway_4

Does Simmons v Castle bring simplicity & clarity to damages for tort, asks Kate Parker

The Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls and Vice President of the Court of Appeal gave judgment on a consent order in Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039—something that would normally be dealt with by a single judge in writing. The judgment was used as an opportunity to formally announce a 10% increase in general damages for most tort actions, where judgment is given after
1 April 2013. The court went on to state: “While it can be said that this conclusion does not achieve perfect justice in every case…Our conclusion has the great merits of providing a simplicity and clarity.”

Time for change

This increase was a key feature of Sir Rupert Jackson’s “package of recommendations” for civil costs reform. It was intended to help compensate claimants for the non-recoverability of success fees and ATE premiums in post-1 April 2013 conditional fee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll