The legal profession has a duty to stand up to executive intimidation
When Pakistan’s president, Pervez Musharraf, declared emergency rule in his country, he told the nation that the measure was necessary to control growing Islamist extremism in Pakistan.
A significant feature of General Musharraf’s crack-down was the arrest and detention of judges and lawyers who he perceived as crippling his government.
EARLIER PRECEDENT
Musharraf is not the first leader to attack the judiciary in this way. An earlier precedent can be found in Egypt where over 1,000 judges threatened to boycott presidential and Parliamentary elections in 2005 unless the government took steps to control corruption, and even earlier in 1968 the judiciary was so outspoken about Nasser’s war policy that he dismissed them in what became known as the “massacre of the judiciary”.
More surprisingly, executive belligerence towards the judges and a determination to emaciate them of their powers has been demonstrated both in the US and the UK, the former by attempting to put detainees beyond the reach of the judges in Guantanamo Bay
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=961ae4db_1)
95ca96e3d47f4eff8d147c4f0df17c77.tmb-mov69x69.png?sfvrsn=3db5d86b_1)
