header-logo header-logo

24 July 2018
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Professor Jonathan Harris QC, Serle Court Chambers

jonathan_harris_qc

Serle Court's Professor Jonathan Harris QC on the art of juggling a multifaceted career

What was your route into the profession?

Quite a complex one! I spent almost 15 years as a full-time academic. I started out in the 1990s as a lecturer at the University of Birmingham—a place that was filled with great characters and a wonderful working environment. I taught trusts and private international law. I moved onto Nottingham University, before returning to Birmingham as a professor. They kindly let me out to do a pupillage. At the time, I did not anticipate practising at the Bar full-time but I got the bug and, after a few years practicing as a door tenant, joined Serle Court on a full-time basis in 2009.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Juggling the various elements of my professional life. As well as my Bar practice, I spend a good deal of time each year working on Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (of which I became joint general editor with Lord Collins in 2015). I am honoured, if somewhat daunted, to have responsibility (along with a first-class team of editors) for taking forward this great work.

I also retain a part-time chair at King’s College, London. I sit on governmental advisory committees, draft legislation for overseas jurisdictions, organise conferences and edit journals and book series. Inevitably, a lot of overseas travel is involved. Furthermore, in the last two years, a great deal of my time has been spent advising on the implications of Brexit for cross-border drafting and dispute resolution.  

I suppose I should give some of these things up—but I enjoy seeing the law from so many different perspectives too much.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Lord Collins of Mapesbury. I worked as an editor of Dicey, Morris & Collins for ten years, before becoming joint general editor with him. In that time, I have learned more from him about the values of clarity, precision and sound judgment than I could have gleaned myself in a lifetime.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I imagined myself becoming a school teacher. I ended up teaching in higher education instead.  Despite the demands of practice, I could not imagine giving up teaching entirely. I still get immense satisfaction from passing on knowledge, understanding and enthusiasm to the next generation.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Sir Wilfrid Robarts QC from Agatha Christie’s Witness for the Prosecution

What change would you make to the profession?

There is a substantial gap in England between practice and academia. It is extremely common in many continental jurisdictions for senior practitioners also to be university professors. It seems to me that the profession could make greater use of the expertise that universities have to offer; and, equally, there is no doubt that students and academics can benefit greatly from the insights that practitioners provide.

How do you relax?

Reading, writing, theatre—and trying to keep up with my three children.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll