header-logo header-logo

24 July 2018
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Professor Jonathan Harris QC, Serle Court Chambers

jonathan_harris_qc

Serle Court's Professor Jonathan Harris QC on the art of juggling a multifaceted career

What was your route into the profession?

Quite a complex one! I spent almost 15 years as a full-time academic. I started out in the 1990s as a lecturer at the University of Birmingham—a place that was filled with great characters and a wonderful working environment. I taught trusts and private international law. I moved onto Nottingham University, before returning to Birmingham as a professor. They kindly let me out to do a pupillage. At the time, I did not anticipate practising at the Bar full-time but I got the bug and, after a few years practicing as a door tenant, joined Serle Court on a full-time basis in 2009.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Juggling the various elements of my professional life. As well as my Bar practice, I spend a good deal of time each year working on Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (of which I became joint general editor with Lord Collins in 2015). I am honoured, if somewhat daunted, to have responsibility (along with a first-class team of editors) for taking forward this great work.

I also retain a part-time chair at King’s College, London. I sit on governmental advisory committees, draft legislation for overseas jurisdictions, organise conferences and edit journals and book series. Inevitably, a lot of overseas travel is involved. Furthermore, in the last two years, a great deal of my time has been spent advising on the implications of Brexit for cross-border drafting and dispute resolution.  

I suppose I should give some of these things up—but I enjoy seeing the law from so many different perspectives too much.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Lord Collins of Mapesbury. I worked as an editor of Dicey, Morris & Collins for ten years, before becoming joint general editor with him. In that time, I have learned more from him about the values of clarity, precision and sound judgment than I could have gleaned myself in a lifetime.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I imagined myself becoming a school teacher. I ended up teaching in higher education instead.  Despite the demands of practice, I could not imagine giving up teaching entirely. I still get immense satisfaction from passing on knowledge, understanding and enthusiasm to the next generation.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Sir Wilfrid Robarts QC from Agatha Christie’s Witness for the Prosecution

What change would you make to the profession?

There is a substantial gap in England between practice and academia. It is extremely common in many continental jurisdictions for senior practitioners also to be university professors. It seems to me that the profession could make greater use of the expertise that universities have to offer; and, equally, there is no doubt that students and academics can benefit greatly from the insights that practitioners provide.

How do you relax?

Reading, writing, theatre—and trying to keep up with my three children.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll