header-logo header-logo

NLJ PROFILE: Professor Jonathan Harris QC, Serle Court Chambers

24 July 2018
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
jonathan_harris_qc

Serle Court's Professor Jonathan Harris QC on the art of juggling a multifaceted career

What was your route into the profession?

Quite a complex one! I spent almost 15 years as a full-time academic. I started out in the 1990s as a lecturer at the University of Birmingham—a place that was filled with great characters and a wonderful working environment. I taught trusts and private international law. I moved onto Nottingham University, before returning to Birmingham as a professor. They kindly let me out to do a pupillage. At the time, I did not anticipate practising at the Bar full-time but I got the bug and, after a few years practicing as a door tenant, joined Serle Court on a full-time basis in 2009.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Juggling the various elements of my professional life. As well as my Bar practice, I spend a good deal of time each year working on Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws (of which I became joint general editor with Lord Collins in 2015). I am honoured, if somewhat daunted, to have responsibility (along with a first-class team of editors) for taking forward this great work.

I also retain a part-time chair at King’s College, London. I sit on governmental advisory committees, draft legislation for overseas jurisdictions, organise conferences and edit journals and book series. Inevitably, a lot of overseas travel is involved. Furthermore, in the last two years, a great deal of my time has been spent advising on the implications of Brexit for cross-border drafting and dispute resolution.  

I suppose I should give some of these things up—but I enjoy seeing the law from so many different perspectives too much.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Lord Collins of Mapesbury. I worked as an editor of Dicey, Morris & Collins for ten years, before becoming joint general editor with him. In that time, I have learned more from him about the values of clarity, precision and sound judgment than I could have gleaned myself in a lifetime.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I imagined myself becoming a school teacher. I ended up teaching in higher education instead.  Despite the demands of practice, I could not imagine giving up teaching entirely. I still get immense satisfaction from passing on knowledge, understanding and enthusiasm to the next generation.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Sir Wilfrid Robarts QC from Agatha Christie’s Witness for the Prosecution

What change would you make to the profession?

There is a substantial gap in England between practice and academia. It is extremely common in many continental jurisdictions for senior practitioners also to be university professors. It seems to me that the profession could make greater use of the expertise that universities have to offer; and, equally, there is no doubt that students and academics can benefit greatly from the insights that practitioners provide.

How do you relax?

Reading, writing, theatre—and trying to keep up with my three children.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll