header-logo header-logo

25 October 2024
Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Sports litigation , Tribunals , Tax
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Championship League refs decision goes beyond the pitch

194052

The Supreme Court’s recent football referee decision on the common law test for employment status has ‘wide ramifications’ for employment law, Harry Sheehan, Devereux Chambers, writes in this week’s NLJ

The case, Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Professional Game Match Officials, revolved around the working terms of a company that supplies referees and match officials for high-level football competitions such as the Premier League and FA Cup. HMRC argued that referees who officiate in their spare time while being employed full-time elsewhere—primarily refs in Championship League and FA Cup games—are employed by the company and should be taxed as such. The company disagreed.

Sheehan, who was instructed as junior counsel for Professional Game Match Officials in the appeal to the Supreme Court, writes that the decision ‘provides essential and authoritative guidance to a legal test which is the key to accessing the rights and obligations that form the backbone of employment law’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll