header-logo header-logo

21 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: How far is too far ‘without prejudice’?

211929
Abusive litigation tactics, or simply a solicitor doing their best for their client?

In this week’s NLJ, Clare Hughes-Williams, partner, and Megan Hill, solicitor, DAC Beachcroft, discuss the correspondence between former Chancellor of the Exchequer Nadhim Zahawi’s solicitor, Ashley Hurst and tax campaigner Dan Neidle, who was writing about Zahawi’s tax affairs.

Hurst was subsequently fined by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, which found he ‘improperly attempted to restrict’ Neidle.

Hughes-Williams and Hill consider the behavioural expectations on solicitors seeking to protect their client, and ask ‘where the line is to be drawn between aggressive litigation tactics which may be permissible in certain cases and misconduct’.

Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Dispute resolution
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll