header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: No duty to warn—even when danger is clear

225839
Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group examines the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, where police were found not liable for failing to warn a domestic abuse victim of an imminent attack

Despite a neighbour’s 999 call reporting the assailant lurking outside, no warning was given—and minutes later, the victim was stabbed. The court held that public authorities are generally not liable for omissions, reaffirming the precedent set in Michael.

Davey explores the Tofaris exceptions—such as assumption of responsibility or control over the danger—but finds none applied. He argues the law is ripe for reform, noting that a simple phone call could have prevented the attack. The decision, he warns, may erode public confidence in policing and justice.

An appeal is pending, and the legal community is watching closely.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll