header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

NLJ this week: Platforms on trial—can social media be a defective product?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Social Media , Liability , Consumer , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
224731
Could social media platforms be treated as ‘products’ under the Consumer Protection Act 1987? If so, they could face strict liability for harms caused by addictive design features and algorithmic manipulation, says Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers, writing in NLJ this week

Lambert argues that platforms are not mere conduits of ‘pure information’ but engineered environments with foreseeable risks—especially to children.

Drawing on case law, EU directives and the Online Safety Act 2023, he contends that social media’s design choices—like infinite scrolling or failure to remove harmful content—may breach duties in tort and contract. He highlights internal documents from US litigation showing tech firms knew of the risks but prioritised engagement.

With mounting evidence of harm and legal gaps, Lambert calls for courts to treat social media like any other potentially dangerous product—because the stakes, he warns, are nothing less than the mental health of a generation.

Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Social Media , Liability , Consumer , Personal injury
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Read All
Give your views on disclosure in court
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll