header-logo header-logo

07 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fire & rehire, the Tesco case & potential overhaul under Labour

176263

What are the potential implications of the Tesco ‘retained pay’ case, and, post-election, how might a potential Labour government overhaul the law surrounding fire and rehire?

In this week’s NLJ, Clare Fletcher, PSL counsel at Slaughter and May, looks in detail at the case, USDAW v Tesco, concerning an incentive Tesco offered to employees in 2007 and tried to remove in 2021. Tesco offered a compensatory payment to those employees who agreed and warned those who refused that they would be fired and rehired.

Fletcher, a member of the Employment Lawyers Association Legislative and Policy Committee, looks at the potential ramifications of the case, as well as a new code of practice on fire and rehire. Finally, Fletcher looks into the possible scenario of a Labour government overhauling the law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll