header-logo header-logo

29 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Company , Fraud
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Former DPP offers practical advice on corporate criminal liability

The expansion of the failure to prevent fraud offences means corporates will need to behave better

In this week’s NLJ, former Director of Public Prosecutions Sir Max Hill KC, now senior counsel and policy advisor at King & Spalding, along with the firm’s associates Hannah Thorpe and Alex Tivey discuss the implications.

The authors write: ‘Corporate criminal liability has expanded from niche origins in bribery, corruption and money laundering, to encompassing all economic crime… New legislation calls for better corporate behaviour, evidence-based as to compliance and practice.’

Hill, Thorpe and Tivey offer practical guidance on reasonable prevention measures.

They examine both the failure to prevent offence and the redefinition of the identification doctrine. What implications will these have for large organisations, and how should they ensure compliance with this toughened-up new law? They also look into the increasing use of civil enforcement methods to recover the proceeds of crime, as well as the greater use of deferred prosecution agreements.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll