header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Lessons in scrutiny for public inquiries

131074
In this week’s NLJ, Richard Scorer, head of abuse law & public inquiries at Slater and Gordon, highlights the necessity of ‘proper forensic scrutiny’ during public inquiries.

In his article, Scorer, who has experience of the IICSA, Grenfell, Manchester Arena and COVID-19 public inquiries, makes particular reference to the probing of intelligence services action in the lead up to the Manchester Arena bombing. He explores the lessons for other investigations that can be drawn from the way the evidence unfolded.

Scorer writes: ‘The level of scrutiny can determine whether the failings are properly brought to light. This means probing deeper than the surface justifications, explanations and assurances sometimes offered up by corporate witnesses to get to the unvarnished truth.’ 

Find the full analysis here.

Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll