header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Lessons in scrutiny for public inquiries

131074
In this week’s NLJ, Richard Scorer, head of abuse law & public inquiries at Slater and Gordon, highlights the necessity of ‘proper forensic scrutiny’ during public inquiries.

In his article, Scorer, who has experience of the IICSA, Grenfell, Manchester Arena and COVID-19 public inquiries, makes particular reference to the probing of intelligence services action in the lead up to the Manchester Arena bombing. He explores the lessons for other investigations that can be drawn from the way the evidence unfolded.

Scorer writes: ‘The level of scrutiny can determine whether the failings are properly brought to light. This means probing deeper than the surface justifications, explanations and assurances sometimes offered up by corporate witnesses to get to the unvarnished truth.’ 

Find the full analysis here.

Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll